In-market control and enforcement of the cosmetics regulation

By Lucy Whitehouse contact

- Last updated on GMT

In-market control and enforcement of the cosmetics regulation
What can we learn from the German in-market control approach for cosmetics on the challenges and trends of enforcing regulation?

This topic was a focus of one session at the recent Cosmetics Europe​ Annual Conference industry knowledge-sharing event in Brussels.

The speakers were:

  • Birgit Huber, Deputy Director General, IKW

  • Eva-Maria Kratz, Specialist Cosmetics and REACH, Chemical and Veterinary Investigation Laboratory (CVUA) Karlsruhe

Session highlights

Here are the key session highlights from the event, as compiled by CEAC organisers​:

The speakers introduced the German in-market control approach for cosmetics, highlighting the

good collaboration between authorities and industry, which has led to common understanding and

expectations on key enforcement aspects.

How to address ‘unavoidable traces of banned materials’ is challenge for both industry and control

authorities.

The presentation explained how Germany addresses the issue by defining ‘trigger levels’

for individual trace.

These levels are set in a way that 90% of products produced under GMP will be below the trigger level. Products above these levels can still be considered as fully compliant, but control authorities will require a reasoned argumentation from the company on why the level is considered as unavoidable.

Recent trends: clearer definitions

In the discussion, questions were raised how to choose appropriate analytical methods in the inmarket control (Germany has introduced methods to ISO for this purpose).

Recent trends in the in-market control were explained, such as a focus on drug ingredients, cosmetic toys or GMP for personalised products mixed in stores.

A clearer and workable definition of nanomaterials was identified as an important need.

Enforcement of e-commerce products remains a difficult task that will need to be addressed horizontally rather than through sector-specific legislation.

The representative of the German control authorities also confirmed the need for efficient enforcement that is based on risk prioritisation and the principle of proportionality.

The objective of enforcement is not the punishment of non-compliant products, but to achieve compliance. In this respect, control authorities also have a strong educational role.

Related news

Show more

Related products

show more

Accelerate your supply chain as pressures intensify

Accelerate your supply chain as pressures intensify

William Reed | 17-Sep-2018 | Technical / White Paper

Food, Drink and Non-Food manufacturers are under pressure. Range reviews, massive retail mergers, the backlash against plastic packaging and the ongoing...

schülke helps to protect sunscreen formulations

schülke helps to protect sunscreen formulations

Schülke & Mayr GmbH | 10-Sep-2018 | Product Brochure

schülke focused on two stabilization methods with the aim of finding optimal solutions for the protection of sunscreen products. The preservative euxyl®...

Pycnogenol® Improves Visible Signs of Aging

Pycnogenol® Improves Visible Signs of Aging

Horphag Research | 31-Aug-2018 | Clinical Study

Nourish the skin from the inside out withPycnogenol®, French maritime pine bark extract.Decades of research on Pycnogenol® have shown it effectively improves...

Related suppliers

Follow us

Featured Events

View more

Products

View more

Webinars