ECHA clarifies animal testing position for cosmetics ingredient: a ‘significant step’ for alternatives

By Lucy Whitehouse contact

- Last updated on GMT

ECHA clarifies animal testing position for cosmetics ingredient: a ‘significant step’ for alternatives

Related tags: European union

The ECHA Board of Appeal has annulled a decision by ECHA requiring an ingredients supplier to test a personal care ingredient on animals in Europe.

The ECHA had previously stated that BASF, a specialty chemicals player, was required to conduct a prenatal developmental toxicity study using rats or rabbits on one of its ingedients, a fatty acid derivative for cosmetic use.

It has now reversed this decision.

REACH and Cosmetics Regulation: how they interact

The European Ombudsman reportedly advised that animal-testing data generated for the purpose of REACH, the EU’s wider chemicals regulation programme, cannot necessarily be relied upon for the safety assessment report required under the Cosmetics Regulation.

Consequently, by barring the substance from the EU market, it was deemed that requested test would ultimately serve no real purpose in protecting humans.

BASF responds

“BASF welcomes the ECHA Board of Appeal decision (case A-013-2016) as a significant step towards alternative solutions,”​ the company said in a statement to Cosmetics Design.

“BASF applies alternative test methods including replacement methods (no animal testing involved) for screening tests in product development and for regulatory tests as soon as a method has been approved for this purpose​.”

BASF notes that it works with national and international institutions and companies to establish and validate new alternative methods and is a world leader in this field.

To promote the development of alternative methods, the company set up its own dedicated laboratory in 2004 for the development of alternative methods.

Non-animal approaches

The reversal of position from the ECHA comes following an intervention by animal rights group PETA.

Going forward, registrants would be well advised to use only non-animal approaches to the hazard assessment of cosmetics ingredients, and where ECHA has serious hazard concerns, these should be raised with the relevant member states in accordance with the law​,” says Dr Julia Baines, a science policy advisor for the PETA International Science Consortium.

REACH applies without prejudice to the animal testing bans laid out in the Cosmetics Regulation.

“The [ECHA] Board has agreed with the [PETA] Science Consortium, correctly recognising that ECHA has a duty to take into account the implications of the Cosmetics Regulation in its administration of REACH.”

Related news

Show more

Related products

show more

Pycnogenol® Improves Visible Signs of Aging

Pycnogenol® Improves Visible Signs of Aging

Horphag Research | 09-Jul-2018 | Clinical Study

Nourish the skin from the inside out withPycnogenol®, French maritime pine bark extract.Decades of research on Pycnogenol® have shown it effectively improves...

Have you met the experts at in-cosmetics global?

Have you met the experts at in-cosmetics global?

Schülke & Mayr GmbH | 28-May-2018 | Product Brochure

schülke welcomed customers to share our experiences, exchange ideas and talk about customer´s needs.
We also presented schülke’s new cosmetic preservative...

Related suppliers

Follow us

Products

View more

Webinars