Cosmetifique can be used with both the iPhone and iPod Touch and claims to have a searchable database of over 5,000 ingredients, in INCI format.
Results for ingredients searches come back highlighted as either red, orange or green, to denote whether the ingredient is good, acceptable or should be avoided.
According to application designer Alfredo Delli Bovi, this can inform the consumer whether the cosmetics they have bought or are planning on purchasing are dangerous to their health or the environment.
Cosmetifique also allows favourite products to be saved with the name, brand and colour, which can then be shared with friends via email, facebook or twitter.
Delli Bovi explained that the ingredients suggested as good are natural and green ingredients.
“We talked to make-up gurus and 90 percent of them preferred natural ingredients, so we don’t suggest chemical ones like dimethicone,” he said.
A local scientific agency provided much of the information for the application as did webservices, explained Delli Bovi.
The application is now available to purchase from Apple’s App Store at a price of $1.99.
Cosmetifique answers consumer demand for more information about a product’s ingredients and fits the green and natural trends that have been sweeping through the industry.
However, the industry is unlikely to welcome this addition to the consumer’s handbag.
All products for sale in Europe have to comply with the European Cosmetics Directive which provides a list of ingredients banned from cosmetics and others for which concentration limits apply. If a product complies with the Directive and therefore allowed for sale in the region, then, according to industry, it can be deemed safe.
According to Chris Flower from the UK cosmetics trade association the CTPA, it is for this reason, among others, that the application is 'concerning'.
"The launch of this new i-phone application is concerning for a number of reasons. Firstly, because it suggests that consumers might find ‘dangerous’ substances in their cosmetics. In Europe, all products sold are subject to strict safety legislation so would never pose a safety threat to consumers," he told CosmeticsDesign-Europe.com.
In addition, he said it 'perpetuated the myth that natural ingredients are not chemicals and are in some way safer than man-made ingredients'.
Getting reliable and accessible information to consumers about what is in cosmetic products and their safety is a challenge but is likely to become more important if applications such as Cosmetifique take off.
Bodies such as the CTPA and its US equivalent the PCPC have consumer orientated websites (www.thefactsabout.co.uk and www.cosmeticsinfo.org, respectively) that contain ingredients glossaries in an attempt to provide information about what is present in cosmetics products and why.
10 comments (Comments are now closed)
Consumers are sheep
They buy into whatever the latest trend, scare tactic or hallow cause is. I had a woman walked into my boutique and announced that she didn't want anything with chemical in it. I told her, "in that case, there is nothing here for you". After a moment of silence, I went on to informed her that her very exsistance was due to chemical reactions, daily, including her conception and when she die the same will occur. As wonderful as the internet is, it has become the greatest way to "misinform" simple minded people. I have so many instances of these people coming into my boutique. When I counter whatever they are saying with logic, some actually go away ( to the internet) come back another day with a " but what about..."
Report abuse
Posted by Claudia
27 January 2010 | 20h29
Wow
I found this article interesting ,it is definitely something I would like to download because it is very useful. I am label conscious so this would make things a lot easier to understand, thank you for the helpful information
Report abuse
Posted by jS
25 January 2010 | 19h47
big thumbs up
to john hill! well said!
Report abuse
Posted by jc
21 January 2010 | 01h19
Extremely concerning
I don't see that gender has any bearing on this discussion, Amanda, and I have to say that I think you misrepresented John Hill's comments. He was not suggesting that any accurate information be withheld from consumers, but questioned the ability of the application's authors to use adequately peer-reviewed data. It is already known that some substances banned for use in cosmetics in the EU are listed as being safe by this application. Is this what you want?
Report abuse
Posted by Dene Godfrey
14 January 2010 | 18h55
iPhone application is concerning
The launch of this new i-phone application is concerning for a number of reasons. Firstly, because it suggests that consumers might find ‘dangerous’ substances in their cosmetics. In Europe, all products sold are subject to strict safety legislation so would never pose a safety threat to consumers. Secondly, because the way it is being promoted seems to perpetuate the myth that natural ingredients are not chemicals and are in some way safer than man-made ingredients. In reality, everything is chemical, whether natural or synthetic, and it’s not simply the presence of an ingredient that determines how safe a product is. Qualified safety assessors have to consider a whole range of factors, including the quantity of the ingredient contained in the product, how it reacts with other ingredients and how often the product is used.
The UK’s cosmetic, toiletry and perfumery industry is absolutely behind providing consumers with scientific facts about the ingredients in their products, so that they can make informed choices about what they buy. However, it believes these choices should be grounded in sound science. The consumer information website, www.thefactsabout.co.uk, contains a comprehensive glossary which includes information on the safety of many of the ingredients found in products.
Report abuse
Posted by Chris Flower - Director General of CTPA
14 January 2010 | 11h38
Misinformed consumers
I have been formulating & manufacuring personal care products for over 15 years; the last 10 years I have specialized in "natural" ingredients. I love them and use them often, but, to say something synthetic is dangerous; only because it is synthetic is beyond ignorant; highlighting them in red is obviously meant as a "warning", and the natural in "green" as a "good to go". 99% of them are safe and anyhting used in excess can be "bad for you". I hear comments like "Propylene Glycol is used in Anti-freeze, so, I am not putting it on my skin." Then that same person will go home and eat it; as it is a very commom ingredient in food products. Why is it in Anti-Freeze? Maybe those who think they know how dangerous these ingredients are should look for facts, not opinions.
The "informed consumer" should know that the FDA and other government agencies do not allow ingedients on the market place without "animal testing"; synthetic, OR, natural. These large ingredient manufacturers are the ones pushing for better and safer testing methods.
Quite frankly this APP is just a duplication of a website that already exists, that is dedicated to "misinforming" the consumer.
Report abuse
Posted by Erik Larsen
14 January 2010 | 00h49
agreement with chemists
I agree with both John and "Chief Formulator". The misinformation and confusion to consumers is unfortunate. We seem to go full circle every 10-20 years on what is 'good' and 'bad' for our skin and our bodies. I don't even think this is a matter of green vs not being green, but rather a situation of people taking studies and blowing them out of proportion, or not fully understanding how and why certain ingredients are important for the efficacy and safety of a product. I am often surprised to hear that people are using 'such and such a brand because they are 'paraben free' of 'fragrance free' or what have you, but then not looking at the alternative ingredients, what the preservation system is, or what this actually means. This new app could be helpful to those in the industry, chemists, product developers, etc., but I agree, is likely to add more confusion to the standard consumer. In addition, why couldn't the app simply present the information without judgement or precedent towards 'safety'? At that point, the consumer could look to their product companies with questions vs assumptions.
Report abuse
Posted by Andrea Scott
13 January 2010 | 21h52
I agree
I agree with John. I have no problem with them listing cosmetics that are vegan, but saying something is not safe is just disingenuous. The amount of misinformation is atrocious. I am tired of the "green" revolution. Consumers view natural cosmetics through rose coloured glasses as not everything natural has benefit for the skin and in fact can damage the skin. Who is going to review the list? I find that most of the information is misconstrued. Most is from animal studies which are not necessarily a reliable indicator anyway.
Cheif Formulator
Eclogite Skin Care
Report abuse
Posted by Jacine Greenwood
13 January 2010 | 21h33
Informed Consumer
As a biologist, I'm appalled that another scientist doesn't want the public to know about the ingredients in the products they buy. I'm a woman, and two years ago I became vegan after seeing the atrocities that animals are put through for various industries, especially the cosmetic industry. I refuse to buy any products that contain animal ingredients or were tested on animals in any part of their development. I'm also a biologist that is adamantly opposed to vivi-section. The vast majority of the world remains unconcerned with their health and the details behind the products they use. As a result the information you wish concealed from consumers will largely go unnoticed. But, for those that care like me, one of the most powerful tools we have in a commercialized society is to choose who gets our money. We can then feel confident that our money isn't used at the detriment of animals, the environment, or our own health.
Report abuse
Posted by Amanda Webster
13 January 2010 | 19h14
We don't need this iPhone app!!
Oh great!! As a cosmetic chemist with a long a successful career in the industry, I was just starting to feel that all of the misinformation about ingredients on the internet was finally beginning to be cleared up. Now we have the "greenies" producing an 'app' that supposedly will tell consumers which ingredients are "dangerous". Give me a break! No more misinformation please! Tell me, who is the so-called scientific expert with extensive knowledge of the 10s of thousands of raw material ingredients that is going to pick and choose which ones consumers should buy because they are safe?! Who is going to peer review this person's choices?! This is just going to turn out to be another source of misinformation that consumers unwittingly will believe. This is a blow for the cosmetics industry and should be stopped or at least "countered" with real scientific information.
John C. Hill
President and Chief Formulator
Never Over The Hill Cosmetics LLC
Mesa, Arizona
Report abuse
Posted by John C. Hill
13 January 2010 | 16h26
Read all comments (10)